Sunday, February 24, 2013

EU stops Merger of Tencel and Lenzing Lyocell - Part 1 (2001)

A review of the EU documents blocking the proposed Acordis/Lenzing merger (to create "the new entity") reveals the following conclusions on the technology involved in the Tencel/Lyocell part of the merger.
  • The new entity would remain the only player worldwide who is able to license this technology as far as ready-to-produce technology is concerned.
  • No other producer could therefore start lyocell production without entering into a licensing agreement with the new entity or running the risk of patent litigation.
  • Competition in the market for lyocell production and processing technology would therefore be eliminated as far as ready-to-produce technology is concerned. 
  • The effect of such a situation would not only be the slowing down of technological development but also the likely alignment of any new entrants behaviour in lyocell staple fibre production with the new entity's behaviour, making it likewise impossible for any new entrant to effectively challenge the new entity's dominant position in lyocell staple fibres.
  • This slowing down of technological development would be due to two factors: firstly, the immediate incentive of the new entity to invest in technological developments, and thus lower barriers to entry, would be reduced by the "free rider" problem it could face with regard to the licensee. 
  • Whilst this freerider problem also exists in regard to the current competitive situation between Acordis and Lenzing, it is effectively counterbalanced by the technological rivalry between both companies, which provides an incentive to innovate. 
  • Post-merger, the incentive to innovate would therefore be reduced.
Case No COMP/M.2187 CVC/Lenzing

(More to come)

How the EU justified the same merger 3 years later will be the subject of later posts.

Wednesday, February 20, 2013

Geoffrey Owen's Tencel lyocell history extracts (Part 6 - Lenzing)

Geoffrey Owen of the Department of Management, London School of Economics presented a paper at SPRU in October this year entitled "Innovation in the man-made fibres industry: corporate strategy and national institutions." It is based on unpublished material made available to the author by Akzo Nobel, Lenzing and Courtaulds (amongst others) and is available in full here on the web as a PDF file. It contains excellent sections on Tencel lyocell development history, the sixth extract of which is reproduced below.  This final part deals with the early history of Lenzing leading to their lyocell development.

The rayon factory in the town of Lenzing, situated in Upper Austria between Salzburg and Linz, was built in 1938 as part of the Nazi authorities’ self-sufficiency programme; a number of plants were built in Southern Germany and Austria in order to replace cotton imports. The rayon factory was adjacent to an existing pulp mill, which became the main source of woodpulp; the mill was bought by Lenzing in 1969. The integration of pulp and rayon production gave Lenzing a cost advantage over rayon producers such as Courtaulds which obtained their wood pulp from distant suppliers.

After the war the company was controlled by two partially state-owned banks, Landerbank and Creditanstalt. Subsequent mergers in the Austrian banking industry led to the creation of Bank Austria, which became the principal shareholder. Lenzing was listed on the Vienna Stock Exchange in 1985 but only about 10 per cent of the shares were offered to outside investors. Lenzing was expected to make profits and to pay dividends but it was not a shareholder-driven company. As the principal employer in its region, it had a social responsibility which influenced its strategic decisions, not least its determination to make the best possible use of the site. A drawback of the site was the lack of water and Lenzing had to invest in costly techniques to
reduce its water consumption while also meeting the environmental rules laid down by the regional government. The result was a cleaner manufacturing process, giving the company the confidence to continue improving the viscose process at a time when other producers were cutting back. 


Lenzing also developed speciality cellulosic fibres, of which the most important was modal; launched in 1964, this was a “high wet modulus” fibre, stronger than rayon and suitable for hightenacity applications.  Lenzing took a cautious approach to synthetic fibres. It made a brief foray into acrylics and later into polyester in partnership with Hoechst, but was never a major producer. Because of its limited involvement in synthetics, Lenzing was less affected than most other European fibre producers by the over-capacity crisis of the mid-1970s. At the end of that decade it made what turned out to be an important decision to participate in an Indonesian viscose plant with the Indian Ashok Birla group. The Indians had asked for technical assistance and in exchange Lenzing secured a minority interest in the new company. This plant, which started production in 1982, gave the Austrian company a foothold in a region where demand for man-made fibres was growing fast, and paved the way for subsequent investments in Asia; Lenzing later acquired majority control of the Indonesian company.

Like Courtaulds, Lenzing was aware of possible alternatives to the viscose process and it initiated research into solvent spinning during the 1980s. A pilot plant was built in 1990 and five years later Lenzing decided to manufacture its own lyocell fibre, a direct competitor to Tencel; production began in 1997. In 2004 Lenzing bought the ex-Courtaulds Tencel business from CVC.This added the two Tencel plants which Courtaulds  had built, in the UK and the US, to Lenzing’s existing plant in Austria. All three factories were subsequently expanded, and in 2010 Lenzing announced plans to build a new Tencel plant in Austria. The Tencel takeover was one of a series of moves which gave the Austrian company a more international dimension. The Indonesian plant was enlarged and in 2005 the decision was taken to build a viscose plant at Nanjing, China; another Asian viscose plant, in India, is expected to come on stream in 2013. Lenzing is now one of the two leading producers of cellulosic fibres, the other being the Aditya Birla group in India. Nearly 60 per cent of its sales come from Asia, but the heart of the company remains the original site in Lenzing; some 3,000 out of the company’s total labour force of 6,600 are employed there. 

Although Lenzing has diversified on a small scale outside fibres, principally in plastics, its strategy since the war has been based on the belief that, with continuous investment in new technology and new product development, cellulosic fibres will remain a good business to be in. This consistency has been reinforced by the company’s ownership structure. In 2000 Bank Austria sold its shares to an Austrian foundation, the B & C Private Foundation, whose mission was to act as a long-term core investor in Lenzing, with a commitment to maintain the company’s role in the Austrian economy. In 2011, as part of a capital reconstruction which involved the issue of new shares, B & C reduced its share of the voting shares to 68 per cent and the free float was increased to about 33 per cent.  Part of the motivation was to make Lenzing shares more accessible to international investors. 


Monday, February 18, 2013

Lenzing's purchase of Tencel approved by Austrian authorities (2005)

LONDON (CNI)--Lenzing’s bid to acquire the Tencel cellulose fibres group has finally been approved by the Austrian Cartel Court, the Austrian fibres group said Wednesday.

The deal was originally announced in May 2004, subject to regulatory approval. Provisional agreement for the takeover had been given by the Austrian anti-trust authorities in February 2005 on the basis that a number of conditions and restrictions would be met by Lenzing.

These were addressed by the company and, it said in a statement: “The anti-trust authorities had no objections to releasing the modified project.”

By: Mark Whitfield


13 April 2005 16:46 [Source: ICIS news]


Chronologically Mark marks the end of our story.  Game over.  

We will however fill in some details for the Year folders, hope for more comments from those involved, more "Likes" and "+1's", add any news as it appears, and tidy up.

Saturday, February 16, 2013

Lenzing’s Tencel Takeover to Proceed (2005)

Lenzing’s takeover of Tencel, its rival in the global market for lyocell cellulose fiber, had been blocked by Austria’s Supreme Court on competition grounds. However, the Austrian company says it has reached a compromise with the country’s antitrust authority, according to which the acquisition will be allowed to proceed within the next one to two months.
The merger, proposed 10 months ago, would give Lenzing a complete monopoly in the European and North American lyocell markets, where Tencel is the only other producer.
The Supreme Court upheld a decision by the Higher Regional Court of Vienna, Austria’s antitrust authority, that the acquisition from the investment group CVC Capital should be barred because it creates a monopoly in the fiber.
Under the compromise, Lenzing has agreed that over the next six years it will not close its 40,000 ton-per-year lyocell plant at Heiligenkreuz, northern Austria, thereby safeguarding 180 jobs. It has also pledged not to move a lyocell R&D unit out of Austria.
“Under Austrian competition law, a ban on an acquisition can be waived if a compromise is reached which benefits the Austrian economy,” says a Lenzing official.
The takeover did not have to be backed by the European Commission, the European Union’s main competition authority, because Tencel’s annual sales of €100 million ($133 million) were below the threshold for EU approval.
The only national antitrust authority, besides Austria’s, to investigate the acquisition was the Office of Fair Trading (OFT) of the UK, where Tencel is based. It accepted Lenzing’s argument that the merger would not form an illegal monopoly because lyocell has to compete against viscose, cotton, polyester and other fibers.
The OFT enquiry found that in 2003, Tencel produced a maximum of 55,000 tons of lyocell, equivalent to 60 to 80 percent of the total capacity of its plants at Grimsby, UK, and in Alabama. Yet it accounted for 75 percent of total worldwide sales of the fiber, according to the OFT.

Friday, February 15, 2013

New Lenzing TENCEL®-Jumboline (2013)

New TENCEL® Jumboline
New TENCEL® Jumboline
TENCEL® Denim
TENCEL® Denim
This is a repeat of the news, recorded under the Aims tag above, which prompted the development of this blog in July last year.  The capital costs are now down to $2700/annual tonne compared with the over $4000/annual tonne being projected by Courtaulds for their 4th (Asian) factory in 1999.  All the savings from the Lenzing infrastructure on the old viscose site and the locally grown and pulped wood will be coming into play. This operation will get close to the original Courtaulds Research vision for Tencel in the 1980's.  

It's interesting also to see the Courtaulds Tencel 1990's launch market (denim) getting a mention again and hopefully this now means the more predictable mass-market denim rather than the "Armani" denim market on which so many unrealistic expectations were built in the mid 90's.

Lenzing is constructing a jumbo TENCEL® production line at the plant in Lenzing. It will go into operation in 2014.
The most modern fiber plant worldwide
The most modern fiber production line in the world is currently being built in Lenzing, Austria. The combined expertise and technologies of the Lenzing and the Tencel Group, which were recently merged, are being applied for the first time in the construction of the state-of-the-art TENCEL® plant. The new plant marks an exciting new chapter in TENCEL® technology.
“TENCEL® represents the greatest technological innovation in the man-made cellulose fiber industry since the invention of the Viscose fiber around 100 years ago,” explains Dieter Eichinger, Vice President Business Unit Textile